Illinois Anti-Kickback Law at a Glance
In Illinois, anti-kickback and referral laws focus on preventing improper financial incentives that influence healthcare decisions. A key provision is 225 ILCS 60/22.2, which specifically prohibits physicians from splitting professional fees with others in exchange for referrals. These laws aim to ensure ethical medical practice and prevent conflicts of interest that could compromise patient care. While Illinois law does not mirror the comprehensive federal Stark Law, it does intersect with federal anti-kickback statutes, particularly in cases involving referrals for services covered by federal health programs.
State Statutes
The primary state statute governing fee-splitting and referrals in Illinois is 225 ILCS 60/22.2, which prohibits physicians from receiving or offering any portion of their professional fees in exchange for referrals of patients or services. This law applies broadly to all healthcare professionals licensed in the state and aims to prevent practices that could distort clinical decision-making or lead to unnecessary medical services. While this statute is limited in scope compared to federal laws, it reinforces the principle that referrals should be based on the best interests of the patient, not financial arrangements.
Unlike some other states that have more expansive referral laws, Illinois does not have a specific statute that covers all types of referrals or imposes strict liability for self-referrals. However, the law does align with federal standards in its prohibition of fee-splitting arrangements. The interplay between 225 ILCS 60/22.2 and federal statutes like 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b) and 42 U.S.C. § 1395nn can be significant in cases involving referrals for services payable by Medicare or Medicaid.
Enforcement
Enforcement of Illinois anti-kickback and referral laws is primarily carried out by state licensing boards and regulatory agencies. The Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (IDFPR) oversees the licensing of healthcare professionals and can investigate and take disciplinary action against physicians or other providers who violate fee-splitting or referral laws. In addition, the Illinois Attorney General’s Office may become involved in cases involving potential fraud or illegal remuneration under state or federal law.
The Federal Overlay
The federal Anti-Kickback Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b), makes it a felony to knowingly and willfully offer, pay, solicit, or receive remuneration to induce or reward referrals of items or services payable by a federal health care program. The Stark Law, 42 U.S.C. § 1395nn, separately prohibits physician self-referrals for designated health services payable by Medicare or Medicaid, on strict-liability terms. Both regimes carry safe harbors and exceptions published at 42 C.F.R. § 1001.952. State referral and fee-splitting statutes operate alongside these federal prohibitions and can apply even where no federal program payment is involved.
Reading the State Desk
Illinois anti-kickback and referral laws interact with federal regimes in both overlapping and distinct ways. For further exploration of these interactions, see /practice-areas/ for an overview of anti-kickback defense research topics, /the-anti-kickback-statute-explained-why-referral-payments-trigger-scrutiny/ for a detailed explanation of the Anti-Kickback Statute, /safe-harbors-under-the-anti-kickback-statute-and-where-providers-get-tripped-up/ for an analysis of safe harbors, /aks-and-stark-law-how-the-two-regimes-overlap-in-healthcare-investigations/ for an overview of AKS and Stark Law overlap, /recent-antikickback-statute-decisions/ for recent legal developments, and /faq/ for frequently asked questions.
About the Research Desk
This site is an editorial research archive for Antikickbackdefense. It summarizes public materials, case law, and statute-level references without offering intake or representation.
Editorial Policy
Every page is written in a neutral research voice. We do not publish attorney persona copy, client-matching language, fake reviews, or consultation CTAs.
Citations Notice
Case references, statute numbers, and procedural rules are cited where relevant. Readers should verify authorities before relying on any summary.