New York Anti-Kickback Law at a Glance
New York maintains a framework of state laws that regulate fee-splitting and referral arrangements in healthcare. These laws are designed to prevent improper financial incentives that could influence clinical decisions or compromise patient care. While New York does not have a broad statutory anti-kickback law like some other states, it addresses specific forms of misconduct under professional and social service statutes. These provisions apply to both private and public healthcare systems, particularly where Medicaid or other state-funded programs are involved. The state laws work in tandem with federal statutes such as the Anti-Kickback Statute and Stark Law, creating a layered regulatory environment for healthcare providers and entities.
State Statutes
N.Y. Educ. Law § 6530(18) defines professional misconduct as the act of giving or receiving a fee for referring a patient. This provision applies to licensed professionals, particularly those in the healthcare field, and is intended to prevent conflicts of interest that may arise when financial incentives are tied to referral decisions. The statute reflects broader ethical standards and serves as a deterrent against practices that could distort professional judgment or harm patient welfare.
N.Y. Soc. Serv. Law § 366-d(2) criminalizes the act of paying or receiving remuneration for the referral of a patient for services that are reimbursable under Medicaid. This statute is particularly significant because it directly ties the legality of referral arrangements to the involvement of state-funded healthcare programs. Violations can result in criminal penalties, underscoring the seriousness with which New York treats improper financial incentives in the context of public health services.
Enforcement
The New York State Department of Health is responsible for enforcing anti-kickback and referral laws within the state. This agency oversees compliance with both state and federal regulations, investigates potential violations, and takes appropriate action to ensure that healthcare providers and organizations adhere to ethical and legal standards in their operations.
The Federal Overlay
The federal Anti-Kickback Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b), makes it a felony to knowingly and willfully offer, pay, solicit, or receive remuneration to induce or reward referrals of items or services payable by a federal health care program. The Stark Law, 42 U.S.C. § 1395nn, separately prohibits physician self-referrals for designated health services payable by Medicare or Medicaid, on strict-liability terms. Both regimes carry safe harbors and exceptions published at 42 C.F.R. § 1001.952. State referral and fee-splitting statutes operate alongside these federal prohibitions and can apply even where no federal program payment is involved.
Reading the State Desk
To better understand how New York’s laws interact with federal anti-kickback and referral regulations, further exploration of related topics is available. These include general research topics, explanations of the Anti-Kickback Statute, safe harbors, the overlap between the Anti-Kickback Statute and Stark Law, recent legal decisions, and frequently asked questions. Additional information can be found at /practice-areas/, /the-anti-kickback-statute-explained-why-referral-payments-trigger-scrutiny/, /safe-harbors-under-the-anti-kickback-statute-and-where-providers-get-tripped-up/, /aks-and-stark-law-how-the-two-regimes-overlap-in-healthcare-investigations/, /recent-antikickback-statute-decisions/, and /faq/.
About the Research Desk
This site is an editorial research archive for Antikickbackdefense. It summarizes public materials, case law, and statute-level references without offering intake or representation.
Editorial Policy
Every page is written in a neutral research voice. We do not publish attorney persona copy, client-matching language, fake reviews, or consultation CTAs.
Citations Notice
Case references, statute numbers, and procedural rules are cited where relevant. Readers should verify authorities before relying on any summary.