West Virginia Anti-Kickback Law at a Glance
West Virginia's anti-kickback and referral laws are primarily governed by state statutes that prohibit unlawful remuneration in exchange for referrals of healthcare services. These laws apply broadly, including to arrangements involving state healthcare programs. While West Virginia does not have a specific fee-splitting statute, its referral laws intersect with federal anti-kickback and Stark Law provisions, particularly in cases involving state and federal healthcare programs. These state rules are designed to prevent conflicts of interest and ensure that healthcare referrals are made in the best interests of patients, rather than for financial gain.
State Statutes
W. Va. Code § 9-7-5(a) criminalizes the offering, paying, soliciting, or receiving of any remuneration for the referral of patients or services payable by a state healthcare program. This statute is a felony offense and applies to any individual or entity that engages in such conduct. It aligns closely with the federal Anti-Kickback Statute in its prohibition of remuneration in exchange for referrals, but it is specifically tailored to state programs. This law reflects West Virginia's commitment to preventing fraudulent and abusive practices in the healthcare system, particularly where public funds are at stake.
In addition to W. Va. Code § 9-7-5(a), West Virginia's legal framework is influenced by federal laws, including the Anti-Kickback Statute and Stark Law, which further define and expand the scope of prohibited conduct. These federal statutes provide a broader enforcement context, which may be relevant in cases involving both state and federal healthcare programs.
Enforcement
Enforcement of West Virginia's anti-kickback and referral laws is primarily carried out by the West Virginia Board of Medicine and the West Virginia Board of Nursing, which regulate the conduct of licensed healthcare professionals. Additionally, the West Virginia Attorney General's Office may pursue criminal enforcement actions under W. Va. Code § 9-7-5(a). Professional licensing boards and state regulatory agencies are key players in ensuring compliance with these laws, and violations may result in disciplinary action, fines, or criminal prosecution.
The Federal Overlay
The federal Anti-Kickback Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b), makes it a felony to knowingly and willfully offer, pay, solicit, or receive remuneration to induce or reward referrals of items or services payable by a federal health care program. The Stark Law, 42 U.S.C. § 1395nn, separately prohibits physician self-referrals for designated health services payable by Medicare or Medicaid, on strict-liability terms. Both regimes carry safe harbors and exceptions published at 42 C.F.R. § 1001.952. State referral and fee-splitting statutes operate alongside these federal prohibitions and can apply even where no federal program payment is involved.
Reading the State Desk
West Virginia's anti-kickback and referral laws interact with federal regimes in complex ways, particularly when state and federal healthcare programs overlap. For further analysis, see /practice-areas/ for a breakdown of relevant legal areas, /the-anti-kickback-statute-explained-why-referral-payments-trigger-scrutiny/ for an overview of the Anti-Kickback Statute, /safe-harbors-under-the-anti-kickback-statute-and-where-providers-get-tripped-up/ for an analysis of safe harbors, /aks-and-stark-law-how-the-two-regimes-overlap-in-healthcare-investigations/ for an exploration of how the two regimes interact, /recent-antikickback-statute-decisions/ for recent developments, and /faq/ for common questions and clarifications.
About the Research Desk
This site is an editorial research archive for Antikickbackdefense. It summarizes public materials, case law, and statute-level references without offering intake or representation.
Editorial Policy
Every page is written in a neutral research voice. We do not publish attorney persona copy, client-matching language, fake reviews, or consultation CTAs.
Citations Notice
Case references, statute numbers, and procedural rules are cited where relevant. Readers should verify authorities before relying on any summary.